Two review findings, both confirmed by measurement.
1. The evaluator had no always-argmax lane, so every "vs Van" claim compared
against the *gated* matcher, which is not Van's contract - the original demo
answered every crop with its best-scoring SKU and had no accept line. The new
'van' lane is that contract: same scores, no gate. Against it the local lane
wins both axes at both resolutions (full 61%/77% vs 52%/29%; live 59%/95% vs
57%/32%), but the live coverage margin is one facing, not seven, and the 95%
figure is live-resolution only - at full resolution the same lane reads 77%
with 11 false accepts and a hub alarm.
2. A crop reading only "400g" scored 0.667 on three SKUs, above TEXT_ACCEPT, so
the text lane named a product from a size line. The fill-in job now requires
two non-digit bigrams; the veto is unchanged, so "65%" still contradicts a
local answer. The raw OCR read travels with the ranking through
score_crop_lanes for that check.
Tests: 3 for the size gate (policy + live) and the van lane's own row. Removing
the gate fails all three. Suite 276 -> 280.
tngo
fd72251160