Product recognition demo for supermarket shelf images
tngo
fd72251160
Two review findings, both confirmed by measurement. 1. The evaluator had no always-argmax lane, so every "vs Van" claim compared against the *gated* matcher, which is not Van's contract - the original demo answered every crop with its best-scoring SKU and had no accept line. The new 'van' lane is that contract: same scores, no gate. Against it the local lane wins both axes at both resolutions (full 61%/77% vs 52%/29%; live 59%/95% vs 57%/32%), but the live coverage margin is one facing, not seven, and the 95% figure is live-resolution only - at full resolution the same lane reads 77% with 11 false accepts and a hub alarm. 2. A crop reading only "400g" scored 0.667 on three SKUs, above TEXT_ACCEPT, so the text lane named a product from a size line. The fill-in job now requires two non-digit bigrams; the veto is unchanged, so "65%" still contradicts a local answer. The raw OCR read travels with the ranking through score_crop_lanes for that check. Tests: 3 for the size gate (policy + live) and the van lane's own row. Removing the gate fails all three. Suite 276 -> 280. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github/workflows | ||
| recognization | ||
| .gitignore | ||