Three enrollment views were refused by the name/OCR check at 0.70, and the
research says all three refusals are false negatives:
- sku_l04: the packshot is byte-identical (MD5 510db1965bc483899c0cce17c72ba10e)
to Amazon media 61yWDtDjDuL for ASIN B0197VWHRG, やまや めんたいマヨネーズタイプ
200g, JAN 4903085062863. 明太子屋さんがつくった is a package slogan, not a
competing brand. Caveat recorded: 200g is superseded by the current 300g.
- sku_l07: 丸和油脂 ラッキーマヨネーズ 200g, JAN 4978931401615, corroborated by
Amazon, Rakuten, Yahoo Shopping and Kakaku. The front prints the product name
but never the maker or size, so full-name overlap cannot reach 0.70.
- sku_l10: exact 400g front, JAN 4901001114030, with the 450g rejection.
Also adds the missing sku_l10 OCR read, generated with the current engine, and
l10's attribution entry. Manifests are tracked; the retailer images they cite
are restricted-research and stay untracked, matching the existing precedent.
Two enrollment defects, both found by trying to enroll real packshots.
`rebuild_catalog.py` crashed on every successful run: the report referenced
`small` but the call to `below_pyramid_floor` was missing, so the pyramid-floor
check the enrollment protocol asks for never ran and the tool died with a
NameError after writing the catalog.
The name/OCR check read one orientation. A packshot whose identifying text runs
vertically - the やまや めんたいマヨネーズ image reads 明太手屋さんが only when
rotated - was refused as a mismatch, which is the worst failure this check has:
it rejects good data while claiming to validate it. `best_orientation_text`
tries all four right-angle rotations and picks the one that explains the most of
the catalog name, not the one that reads the most characters, because the
upright pass returns stray kana that concatenate longer than the real read.
The regression test goes through `audit`, not the helper: the bug was that
`audit` called a single-orientation read, and a helper unit test would have
passed on the broken code. Verified to fail before the fix and pass after.
Data now lives in the repo, not /tmp:
data/packshots/source/ packshots as downloaded, with ATTRIBUTION.json
data/evaluations/ per-session run artifacts, so a number in
DECISION.md traces to the run that produced it
sku_l09 is re-sourced at 1000x1000 from Matsukiyo's Rakuten image, replacing
the 305px view that the README documents as the reason l09 wins facings it
should not.
