The protocol asks for a source at least 800px tall so a view can be stored as a
200/400/800px pyramid. Nothing enforced it, and the clean catalog's l09 view is
305px - the documented defect where its inlier scores dwarf every other
reference (85-129 against 10-40) and it wins facings it should not.
Reported, not refused: the view is usable and dropping it would remove the SKU
from the catalog entirely, which is worse than an incomparable score. The fix is
re-sourcing the packshot, which is a data task. The check names the view and its
height so the re-sourcing has a target. Suite 272 -> 274.
Three items from DECISION §8's enrollment protocol were unimplemented and none
of them needed Tier-2 data:
- Eval reports now record provenance: catalog hash, label-file hash, image hash
and the code revision, so a number can be traced to the inputs that produced
it. The catalog hash covers the CSV bytes and the view names, not image bytes:
a re-encoded view of the same product is the same catalog.
- rebuild_catalog flags cross-SKU near-duplicates as text-discriminated
siblings. These are the near-unknown case no threshold rejects - the geometry
is real because the sibling shares the brand's artwork - so they are reported
rather than refused.
- --shelf-tags turns the completeness rule into a live-ready verdict. Without
the shelf's SKU list the verdict is 'unknown', not a guess.
Adds test_rebuild_catalog.py (11 tests; the tool had no test file). Suite 261
-> 272. Also corrects score_crop_lanes' docstring, which still described the
live path as averaging local scores when the local scale decides on the newest
crop.
