3eddc9eafc
The pacing claim rested on single runs. Medians of three 12 s runs per pace, through the shipped server: send 67% coverage / 88% precision, result 63% / 86%, 0 wrong in all six. The two paces are within 4 pp, so the sensitivity the audit measured is gone and what is left is run-to-run noise. The architecture sketch said the text signature was 'name + OCR of its packshot'. The code scores the name alone, deliberately: adding the packshot's own OCR is how l09 used to win l10's facings, because l09's packshot prints l10's actual name. The sketch now says what the code does and why.
40 lines
No EOL
412 B
JSON
40 lines
No EOL
412 B
JSON
{
|
|
"send": {
|
|
"coverage": [
|
|
0.63,
|
|
0.704,
|
|
0.667
|
|
],
|
|
"coverage_median": 0.667,
|
|
"precision": [
|
|
0.773,
|
|
0.884,
|
|
0.973
|
|
],
|
|
"precision_median": 0.884,
|
|
"wrong": [
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
0
|
|
]
|
|
},
|
|
"result": {
|
|
"coverage": [
|
|
0.63,
|
|
0.63,
|
|
0.704
|
|
],
|
|
"coverage_median": 0.63,
|
|
"precision": [
|
|
0.857,
|
|
0.825,
|
|
0.9
|
|
],
|
|
"precision_median": 0.857,
|
|
"wrong": [
|
|
0,
|
|
0,
|
|
0
|
|
]
|
|
}
|
|
} |