The pacing claim rested on single runs. Medians of three 12 s runs per pace, through the shipped server: send 67% coverage / 88% precision, result 63% / 86%, 0 wrong in all six. The two paces are within 4 pp, so the sensitivity the audit measured is gone and what is left is run-to-run noise. The architecture sketch said the text signature was 'name + OCR of its packshot'. The code scores the name alone, deliberately: adding the packshot's own OCR is how l09 used to win l10's facings, because l09's packshot prints l10's actual name. The sketch now says what the code does and why. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| research/2026-09-28-recognition-architecture | ||
| API.md | ||
| DATA.md | ||
| design-price-tags-and-compliance.md | ||
| EXTERNAL-EVAL.md | ||