The pacing claim rested on single runs. Medians of three 12 s runs per pace,
through the shipped server: send 67% coverage / 88% precision, result 63% / 86%,
0 wrong in all six. The two paces are within 4 pp, so the sensitivity the audit
measured is gone and what is left is run-to-run noise.
The architecture sketch said the text signature was 'name + OCR of its
packshot'. The code scores the name alone, deliberately: adding the packshot's
own OCR is how l09 used to win l10's facings, because l09's packshot prints
l10's actual name. The sketch now says what the code does and why.
